PeerSync is a developer-first endpoint review concept. Compare contracts, surface breaking changes and document migration choices.
The problem to solve
A renamed field can look harmless in a pull request while breaking an integration that relies on its old meaning.
The proposed approach
Review example payloads alongside the schema. Record compatibility assumptions before approving a version change.
Working with the example
GET /projects
The sample records “v1 stable” as context and “200” as its state. In a real api collaboration process, the source and responsible role should be checked before acting on that state.
POST /reviews
The sample records “v2 proposed” as context and “201” as its state. In a real api collaboration process, the source and responsible role should be checked before acting on that state.
PATCH /owners
The sample records “Optional field” as context and “204” as its state. In a real api collaboration process, the source and responsible role should be checked before acting on that state.
This preview shows the product direction. It has no account system, integrations or live record storage.
Try the sample ↗